Month: August 2013

INVOLVEMENT OF HEALTHCARE REGULATORY AFFAIR PROFESSIONAL IN OVERSEAS REGISTRATION PROCESS

Posted on Updated on

About Authors:
ANUJ SINGH
VINAYAKA MISSION’S UNIVERSITY
Salem – 636308, Tamil Nadu
anuj.dra@gmail.com

ABSTRACT:- 
Healthcare Regulatory Affair Professional with their experience and strong motivation to excel in the Regulatory field has an ability to motivate & give support and strengthen to teams members, involved in process ofproduct registration. Professional has taught a self-starter with the proven ability to prioritize and manage projects in a busy, fast-paced, multitasking environment, along with their experience in establishing relationship with the decision makers & coordinator. The Pharmaceutical industries are among the most highly regulated industries in the country. As India is growing very rapidly in pharmaceutical sector, there is a need of regulatory affairs professionals to cater the current needs of industries for the global competition. Regulatory affairs professionals are the link between pharmaceutical industries and worldwide regulatory agencies. They are required to be well versed in the laws, regulations, guidelines and guidance of the regulatory agencies. There is a growing need to incorporate the current requirements of pharmaceutical industries in the standard curriculum of pharmacy colleges to prepare the students with the latest developments to serve the industries. The present article discusses the regulatory education and its need, learning resources, courses available,syllabus contents and job opportunities in regulatory affairs.

read full article at

http://www.pharmatutor.org/articles/involvement-healthcare-regulatory-affair-professional-overseas-registration-process

MANUFACTURING DOCUMENTATION IN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY- DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION

Posted on Updated on

About Authors: 
Krunal Parikh1*, Mr. Maheshkumar Kataria2, Jatin Patel1
2Assistant professor, Department of pharmaceutics,
1Seth G.L. Bihani S.D. College of Technical Education,
Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Research,
Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan, INDIA
*Krunal_2922@yahoo.in

ABSTRACT
Documentation is an integral part of good manufacturing practices. It defines a system of information and control so that risks so inherent in misinterpretation and/or error in oral communication are minimized. It consequently strengthens the quality, and its consistency, of all goods and services, as those responsible for the specific operations have clear, unambiguous instructions to follow including active drug substances, is legally mandatory.

read a full length article at

http://www.pharmatutor.org/articles/manufactuting-documentation-pharmaceutical-industry-development-implementation

Capecitabine Intermediate-cxpharma

Posted on

New Drug Approvals

 

 

 

   

Jiangsu Chengxin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd with total area 60,000m2 and total invested amount of RMB 300 million, is a high-tech joint-stock enterprise established in 2012, located in Binjiang Pharm-Chem Industry Park, Qidong, the outstanding cultural city well known as the Rivers and Seas Pearl in Jiangsu Province, close to Chongming Island with merely one separated river. It takes around 1 hour by car from the manufacturing site to Shanghai, the Yangtze River Delta economic metropoli……More

http://www.cxpharma.com/en/about.asp?id=8

Dear sir,

We are just a manufacturer and very strong in the following intermediates:

Intermediates for Capecitabine:

2′,3′-Di-O-acetyl-5′-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine (CAS: 161599-46-8)

1,2,3-Triacetyl-5-deoxy-D-ribose (CAS: 62211-93-2)

Methyl-5-deoxy-2,3-O-isopropylidene-beta-D-ribofuranoside (CAS: 23202-81-5)

We have the dedicated workshop for Capecitabine intermediate. Our capacity is more than 20MT per month. Our company is complied with the requirement from EU GMP, US FDA and Chinese GMP. Just for your information.

If you are interested in any of above, please let me know.

Looking forward to your early reply.

Best regards,


Runya Wang(Ms) / Sales Department 

Add:     No.338 Shanghai Road, Binjiang Pharm-Chem

Industry Park, Qidong, Jiangsu, P.R.China 226221

Tel:       0086-513-86029596

Fax:      0086-513-86105399

Email:   runya.wang@cxpharma.com

Web:     www.cxpharma.com

http://www.cxpharma.com/en/home.asp   in english

View original post

EMA GMP Vs US FDA GMP

Posted on Updated on

Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) are practices and the systems required to be adapted in pharmaceutical manufacturing, quality control, quality system covering the manufacture and testing of pharmaceuticals or drugs including active pharmaceutical ingredients, diagnostics, foods, pharmaceutical products, and medical devices.

Most of the countries have their own regulation for GMP. I would like to discuss on how EMA (EU) GMP differ with the US FDA GMP.
After evaluation of the GMP regulatory comparison of both regulatory authorities, I found that compliance with EU GMPs will most likely also ensure compliance with FDA GMPs because EMA are much more specific and detailed in their guidances as compared to the US FDA
EMA GMP vs. US FDA GMP (A general comparison):
1. Cleaning Validation:
EMA: Annex 15,Clause 41-“Test until clean” is not considered an appropriate alternative to cleaning validation.
FDA: 2 Test until clean- For the system or equipment with a validated cleaning process, this practice of resampling should not be utilized and is acceptable only in rare cases (correspondence to EMA, clause 41, but used in rare cases)
2. Personal training:
a. EMA: Chapter 2, clause 2.9- Continuing training should also be given, and its practical effectiveness should be periodically assessed.
No FDA correspondence for periodic assessment
b. EMA: Chapter 2, clause 2.8- The manufacturer should provide training for all the personnel whose duties take them into production areas or into control laboratories (including the technical, maintenance and cleaning personnel
No FDA correspondence
3. Sample:
a. FDA uses the term reserve sample while EMA categorize sample into two types- retention and reference sample. EMA has additional guidance for retention sample.
b. There is no EMA correspondence to US FDA 21 CFR 211.176 (penicillin contamination)
4. Internal audits:
FDA does not specifically address the requirement to conduct, or to keep records of, internal quality assurance audits. EMA has a chapter on Self Inspection in their guidance documents (Chapter 9: Self Inspection)
5. Air room classification:
a. FDA classifies air on the basis of 0.5 micron only. EMA classifies air into 0.5 and 5 micron, respectively.
b. FDA provides air classification requirement for “in operation” only. EMA provides air classification for “dynamic” and “in operation”, respectively.
c. ISO 6 classification is defined only in FDA.
d. EMA provides the description of clothing required for each grade of cleanroom.
e. Blow/fill/seal technology- FDA: The classified environment surrounding BFS machinery should generally meet Class 100,000 (ISO 8), or better, standards, depending on the design of the BFS machinery and the surrounding room.
EMA: Blow/fill/seal equipment used for aseptic production which is fitted with an effective grade A air shower may be installed in at least a grade C environment, provided that grade A/B clothing is used.
f. EMA- For classification purposes in Grade A zones, a minimum sample volume of 1m cubic should be taken per sample location (No FDA correspondence)
6. Outdoor clothing:
EMA Annex 1, Clause 44- Outdoor clothing should not be brought into changing rooms leading to grade B and C rooms. (No FDA correspondence)
7. Labeling requirement for Investigational medicinal product (IMP):
EMA requires expiry date in the label of IMP {Annex 13, clause 26(j)}. FDA exempts the requirement of expiry date for IMP, except when the new drug is reconstituted at the time of dispensing. (21 CFR 211.137)
8. Packaging control for tamper-evident packaging:
FDA (21 CFR 211.132) provides regulation for tamper-evident packaging requirements for over-the-counter (OTC) human drug products. (No EMA correspondence).
A detailed information on GMP regulation can be found in EU legislation-Eudralex: Volume 4 of “The rules governing medicinal products in the European Union”containing guidance for the interpretation of the principles and guidelines of good manufacturing practices for medicinal products for human use and US FDA 21 CFR 210 and 21 CFR 211

Tips and Thoughts on Critical Process Cleaning Procedures

Posted on

Latest FDA and cGMP Compliance News

How hard can cleaning be? That is something that people who are not involved in the production of pharmaceutical products may ask, but not people in the industry. The general thought process in the industry is that cleaning and cleaning validation is a practice that is necessary and unpleasant and best to be forgotten once it is done. But with the new process validation guidance that has come out from FDA in recent years, it is more important than ever to verify, control and improve our cleaning process validation procedures.

http://www.expertbriefings.com/tips/tips-on-critical-process-cleaning-procedures/#!

EFPIA and PhRMA release their own guideline for sharing clinical trial data

Posted on

 July 25 2013 | By Márcio Barra

Following news of the leaked memo from the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) earlier this week that sparked a wave of controversy, the EFPIA and the U.S.’ Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) released their joint set of principles detailing their strategy to allow a more open access to clinical trial data.

View original post 281 more words